loading register register login login

Buy It Like You Mean It - Tools for Responsible Shopping

4/9 ratings guide hide ratings guide
Rated by
2 peers.

"There is no government or official definition for this term except on meat and poultry products as defined by the US Department of Agriculture. Use of the term “hormone free” is considered “unapprovable” by USDA on any meat products. Meat and poultry products carrying the “no hormones administered” claim imply that the animal must not have received any added hormones during the course of its lifetime.

WHO VERIFIES THIS GENERAL CLAIM?

There is no organization behind this claim other than the company manufacturing or marketing the product. The USDA has defined the use of the term and can hold manufacturers accountable for using the "hormone-free" on all meat products."

Quoting: Consumer Reports Eco-lables center: http://www.greenerchoices.org/eco-labels

meta
by diN0bot 1 year ago
tags:
  • hormone
  • rbgh
  • USDA
[4]
Hormone free is more humane to animals. [ 4 ] "“No hormones administered” or "hormone free" are general claims that imply that no hormones were used in the production of a food product. There is currently no standard definition for the term except for meat products. Unless otherwise specified, there is no organization independently certifying this claim. The producer or manufacturer decides whether to use the claim and is not free from its own self-interest. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits the use of hormones in the raising of hogs or poultry in the United States. Therefore all pork and poultry products that carry the “no hormones administered” label only represent the regulations that are already in place for pork and poultry and should not be taken to mean that the manufacturer is doing anything beyond USDA requirements for conventional pork and poultry products. However, the USDA does allow the use of a number of hormones on beef. Beef and that is labeled as “no hormones administered” is considered to be free from any added hormones over the lifetime of the animal and therefore does imply that the manufacturer has gone beyond USDA regulations for conventional meat production. Use of the term “hormone free” is considered “unapprovable” by USDA on any meat products." Quoting: Consumer Reports Eco-lables center: http://www.greenerchoices.org/eco-labels
0 comments
This label is not regulated. [ ] "“No hormones administered” or "hormone free" are general claims that imply that no hormones were used in the production of a food product. There is currently no standard definition for the term except for meat products. Unless otherwise specified, there is no organization independently certifying this claim. The producer or manufacturer decides whether to use the claim and is not free from its own self-interest. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits the use of hormones in the raising of hogs or poultry in the United States. Therefore all pork and poultry products that carry the “no hormones administered” label only represent the regulations that are already in place for pork and poultry and should not be taken to mean that the manufacturer is doing anything beyond USDA requirements for conventional pork and poultry products. However, the USDA does allow the use of a number of hormones on beef. Beef and that is labeled as “no hormones administered” is considered to be free from any added hormones over the lifetime of the animal and therefore does imply that the manufacturer has gone beyond USDA regulations for conventional meat production. Use of the term “hormone free” is considered “unapprovable” by USDA on any meat products." Quoting: Consumer Reports Eco-lables center: http://www.greenerchoices.org/eco-labels My comment: Why won't the USDA let people know whether their beef is full of hormones?
0 comments
Avatar/Image Frame (coming soon)
Tiny raven icon.